In “A Moral Argument for Atheism,” the second “doctrinal disproof” in The Impossibility of God, the atheist author assumes common moral ground with believers and
The second of the “doctrinal disproofs” presented in The Impossibility of God claims that the God of the Bible does not exist because His actions
We turn now to what the editors of The Impossibility of God call “doctrinal disproofs” of the existence of God, the claim that certain teachings
As promised, we turn now to examine a few problems with “the problem of evil” (moral evil, for our purposes), the claim that says if
In the first of the articles appealing to moral evil as proof of God’s impossibility, the author claims belief in God lacks “rational support,” that
In the previous two articles, we examined examples of “definitional disproofs” of God, including: 1) perfection and a man-made definition of imperfect virtue cannot co-exist
In the previous article we examined the argument that a perfect God must also be a virtuous God, but because virtue involves imperfection, as defined
We turn, now, to a specific example of a “disproof” where the definition of God is said to contain logically contradictory elements, rendering Him impossible.
In the previous article I introduced The Impossibility of God, a collection of essays arguing that God cannot exist because ideas of God are logically
I have an interesting book on my bookshelf entitled, The Impossibility of God, a collection of essays that go beyond claims of the mere improbability
