In the first of the articles appealing to moral evil as proof of God’s impossibility, the author claims belief in God lacks “rational support,” that
In the previous two articles, we examined examples of “definitional disproofs” of God, including: 1) perfection and a man-made definition of imperfect virtue cannot co-exist
In the previous article we examined the argument that a perfect God must also be a virtuous God, but because virtue involves imperfection, as defined
We turn, now, to a specific example of a “disproof” where the definition of God is said to contain logically contradictory elements, rendering Him impossible.
In the previous article I introduced The Impossibility of God, a collection of essays arguing that God cannot exist because ideas of God are logically
I have an interesting book on my bookshelf entitled, The Impossibility of God, a collection of essays that go beyond claims of the mere improbability
In earlier articles we examined the atheists’ assumption that their limited human perspective can speak with authority about ultimate and transcendent realities. We also saw
Atheists sometimes describe terrible diseases by which children suffer and die and declare that they would never believe in a God that would allow such
The previous article highlighted the myth of “science and reason versus faith” and the irony that atheists call people from trust in God to trust
Atheists often recite the mantra that their denial of God’s existence stands on reason and science while belief in God stands on faith. The claim,
