The Human Limitations of Unreasonable Atheism (Part 23): Some Review
Before we review a few key principles of the series thus far, allow me a brief mea culpa. Two weeks ago (in Part 21), I
Before we review a few key principles of the series thus far, allow me a brief mea culpa. Two weeks ago (in Part 21), I
As we continue our look at how human limitations render unreasonable the many arguments against God’s existence, we do well to remember that true wisdom
In “A Moral Argument for Atheism,” the second “doctrinal disproof” in The Impossibility of God, the atheist author assumes common moral ground with believers and
Atheists sometimes describe terrible diseases by which children suffer and die and declare that they would never believe in a God that would allow such
As we begin the third article in the series, a brief statement of its narrow but vital purpose will prove helpful. In speaking of the
The first article in the series showed that God’s existence cannot be legitimately denied by arguing against the possibility of biblical miracles. The God of
Imagine yourself sitting in the classroom on the first day of a biology course at a local college when the professor takes his place behind
Many experiencing intense religious affections during the Great Awakening traced their experience to “some extrinsic and supernatural power upon their minds.” [1] Supposing the source
In the previous article, we explored the importance of discerning between the “secret” and “revealed” things of God. We turn now to six basic principles
The simple question, “How do you know what you claim to know?” easily reveals unreasonable, blind-faith assumptions behind sophisticated arguments of atheism. Gracious use of